Verified Case Study — Recruiting Agency

The recruiting agency that got
banned and came back stronger.

A specialist technology recruiting firm had their LinkedIn account banned after manual high-volume DMs. Zero connections. Zero pipeline. Zero appeals path. Deligatr rebuilt everything properly. 27 client meetings in month 3.

The new accounts outperformed the banned one. A 38% LinkedIn accept rate, a 5.1% email reply rate, and a cost per meeting that dropped 61% vs the founder doing it manually. The right infrastructure changes everything.

Specialty:Technology Recruiting
Market:UK — London and remote
Plan:Starter — $2,500/mo
Start point:LinkedIn account banned
27
Client meetings
Month 3
38%
LinkedIn accept rate
Across 2 accounts
61%
CAC reduction
vs. manual DMs

Client meetings booked per month

Account banned at start. Two fresh accounts built from zero.

M117M227M323M429M531M6Peak: 27 meetings

Cost per client meeting

Before vs after Deligatr

Manual LinkedIn DMs (before)£380
With LinkedIn ban (during)No meetings
Deligatr Starter (after)£148

LinkedIn accept rate after Deligatr

38%
Across 2 accounts
vs
Banned
Before (0 active accounts)
0
account flags

How it started

One morning the account was gone. The pipeline went with it.

LinkedIn bans happen without warning. One day the account works. The next day it does not. No prior notice, no appeal that actually works, no way to retrieve the connection history or conversation threads built over years.

For a recruiting firm that relied on LinkedIn for 100% of business development, this was not just an inconvenience. It was a complete stop to new client pipeline at a moment when 18 candidate roles needed filling.

The LinkedIn account was banned after the founder sent over 100 connection requests per day from a single account using a third-party tool with generic templates.

The agency lost all connections, conversation history and warm prospects overnight with no effective path to appeal.

The founder had been spending 10 hours per week on manual LinkedIn DMs before the ban, with a client booking rate under 1%.

At the point of the ban, the agency had 18 open candidate roles to fill for existing clients and zero new client pipeline.

No email outreach infrastructure existed. The agency was 100% dependent on LinkedIn for all business development.

Why the ban happened and how Deligatr prevented it from happening again

The right LinkedIn infrastructure changes everything

01

What caused the ban

  • 100+ connection requests per day from one account
  • Generic templates with no personalisation
  • Third-party tool with bulk sending behaviour
  • No account warm-up or activity history
02

How Deligatr rebuilt it

  • Two accounts, starting at 10 requests per day each
  • Gradual daily limit increases over 4 weeks
  • Personalised messages referencing specific prospect details
  • Genuine profile activity before outreach began
03

The result

  • 38% connection accept rate across both accounts
  • Zero account flags or safety warnings
  • 27 client meetings in month 3
  • Accounts still active at month 6 with no issues
The Rebuild

From banned account to 27 meetings in 90 days

The exact sequence of actions Deligatr took to rebuild the agency outbound system from zero, week by week.

Build
Week 1

Account damage assessment

Deligatr confirmed the banned account had no viable appeals path. Decision made to build two fresh LinkedIn accounts from zero rather than attempt recovery. Profile optimisation began on both accounts with genuine activity, industry engagement and connection building from a relevant personal network base.

Build
Weeks 1 to 2

Safe infrastructure build

Both LinkedIn accounts warmed at 10 connection requests per day, increasing 5 per day each week. Three outreach email domains purchased and configured with full SPF, DKIM and DMARC. GoHighLevel CRM built with a five-stage pipeline. Accounts verified clean by LinkedIn safety checks before any sequences launched.

Build
Week 3

ICP rebuild with 60% tighter targeting

Deligatr redefined the target from a broad "anyone hiring in tech" to three specific verticals: Series A SaaS companies in London, fintech scale-ups hiring commercial roles, and UK defence contractors needing cleared technical staff. Narrower ICP meant higher relevance and better acceptance rates from the first outreach.

Build
Week 4First meetings week 2

Campaign launch at safe limits

LinkedIn running at 40 connection requests per day across both accounts. Email sequences (4-touch, 16-day cadence) targeting heads of talent and COOs simultaneously. All messages personalised to the specific role, company stage and hiring signal. Zero generic templates sent.

17mtgs
Month 217 client meetings

Momentum builds

LinkedIn accept rate hit 38% across both accounts. 17 qualified client meetings booked. Email sequences delivering 5.1% positive reply rate in the fintech segment. The founder attended every meeting with a full prospect briefing prepared by Deligatr before each call.

27mtgs
Month 327 client meetings4 active mandates

27 meetings. 61% lower CAC.

Full scale reached. 27 client meetings booked. Four progressed to active mandates by end of month. Email added alongside LinkedIn created a compounding touchpoint effect. CAC dropped to £148 per meeting versus £380 when the founder was doing it manually. Zero account flags or LinkedIn safety warnings across both accounts.

Before vs After

The numbers before the ban and after Deligatr

Six months after the rebuild. The agency now runs on a system that cannot be banned, cannot be disrupted by a single platform, and costs 61% less per meeting than the old manual approach.

Metric
Before Deligatr
After Deligatr
LinkedIn accounts active
0 (banned)
2 (safe limits, no flags)
Monthly client meetings
0 (post-ban)
23 to 31 (managed)
LinkedIn accept rate
N/A (account banned)
38%
Cost per meeting
£380 (manual DMs)
£148 (Deligatr)
Hrs per week on outreach
10 hrs (founder)
0 hrs
Email outreach active
No
Yes (5.1% reply rate)
Active client mandates
0 at ban point
4 within 90 days
4

Active client mandates within 90 days of the rebuild going live.

61%

Cost per meeting reduction versus the manual LinkedIn approach that ended in the ban.

0

Account flags or LinkedIn safety warnings across both accounts after 6 months running at full volume.

Full 6-Month View

Month-by-month client meetings after the rebuild

Month 1 is the full rebuild: fresh accounts, fresh infrastructure, fresh ICP. No meetings expected. From month 2, consistent client pipeline. The agency passed their pre-ban meeting volume in month 3 and never looked back.

Month 1
Rebuild
Two fresh accounts built, ICP tightened, infrastructure live.
Month 2
First results
17 client meetings. 38% LinkedIn accept. 5.1% email reply.
Month 3
Surpasses pre-ban volume
27 meetings. 4 active mandates. 61% lower CAC vs manual.
Month 4
Channel diversification
23 meetings. Email adding a compounding second touchpoint.
Month 5
Scale
29 meetings. Third LinkedIn account added to Growth plan.
Month 6
Predictable pipeline
31 meetings. Founder has not done manual outreach in 5 months.

Client meetings per month

Pre-ban manual average: 4 to 6 per month. Industry average: 3 to 5.

Month 1Rebuild month
Month 217 meetings
Month 327 meetings
Month 423 meetings
Month 529 meetings
Month 631 meetings
Pre-ban manual average (4 to 6/mo)
“Getting banned was terrifying at the time. Deligatr rebuilt everything the right way and our accept rate is better than it ever was when we were doing it ourselves. I have not sent a single outreach message manually in five months.”
Founder, technology recruiting agency
FAQ

Questions recruiting agencies ask before starting

The most common questions from recruiting and staffing firms evaluating managed outbound for the first time, especially those worried about LinkedIn safety.

What happens when a recruiting agency gets their LinkedIn account banned?
When LinkedIn bans an account, the agency loses all connections, conversation history and warm prospects overnight. There is no effective appeals path for accounts banned for high-volume automated behaviour. Deligatr rebuilt this agency from zero, creating two fresh LinkedIn accounts with proper warm-up protocols and running them within safe daily limits from day one.
How many meetings did the recruiting agency book with Deligatr?
The recruiting agency booked 27 qualified client meetings in month 3 of their Deligatr campaign. Month 2 delivered 17 meetings. Month 3 scaled to 27 as email was added alongside LinkedIn and the ICP was refined to three specific verticals: Series A SaaS, fintech scale-ups, and UK defence contractors.
How does Deligatr keep LinkedIn outreach safe for recruiting agencies?
Deligatr runs LinkedIn outreach across multiple accounts at safe daily limits, starting at 10 connection requests per day and increasing gradually over four weeks. Accounts are warmed with genuine profile activity before outreach begins. Every message is personalised to reference specific prospect details. No bulk templates. No third-party tools that trigger LinkedIn detection.
What was the CAC reduction for the recruiting agency?
Cost per acquired client meeting dropped 61%, from £380 per meeting when the founder was doing manual LinkedIn DMs to £148 per meeting via Deligatr managed outbound. This also excludes the 10 hours per week the founder previously spent on manual prospecting, which has a significant hidden cost in a recruiting firm where that time could go to candidate delivery.
Can recruiting agencies run LinkedIn outreach without getting banned?
Yes, with the right infrastructure and approach. LinkedIn bans accounts that send bulk identical messages from a single account at high volume. Deligatr uses multiple accounts, safe daily limits, personalised messages with genuine prospect references, and proper account warm-up protocols. This agency achieved a 38% LinkedIn connection accept rate with zero account flags after switching to Deligatr.
Free 30-minute strategy call

Ready to build outreach
that cannot be banned?

Every Deligatr campaign runs across multiple accounts at safe limits with personalised, human-reviewed copy. The agency in this case study has run at full volume for six months with zero account flags.

No tools to configure. No accounts to manage. No risk of bans from doing it wrong. You attend the meetings. We fill your calendar.

No commitment. No pressure. A clear plan for your agency.